On the Road, Day 11: A Case for Quality

Colosseum Crowd

A Typical Symphony Audience

I like to look out into the audience when we take our bows. Seeing the faces of the people applauding is a good gauge of how much they enjoyed the concert.

Tonight was the final Boston Symphony performance of Mahler’s Ninth Symphony before we go on our European tour in a couple of weeks. The 90-minute symphony is long and challenging, both to play and to listen to. Its relentless intensity and stretched tonality prevent it from being easily satisfying in the lyrical manner of a Tchaikovsky or Dvorak.

Yet when I looked into the audience, which was a pretty full house, what I saw was more than gratifying. Not only was it clear that the performance was meaningful to the listeners, I was surprised to see a fairly balanced division of people in their 20s and 30s, 40s and 50s, and 60s and 70s. Surprised because the naysayers who prophesy the doom of symphony orchestras tell us that only rich, old people go to concerts anymore. I’m sorry, but that’s not what I saw tonight. And let me add that going to a symphony concert is no more expensive than the average ticket for a Red Sox game at Fenway Park, and a lot less than a Fenway box seat. So if you can afford to sit in the bleachers and get a hot dog, you can afford the Boston Symphony.

A prevailing narrative, promulgated in many instances–amazingly enough, by some symphony orchestras’ very administrations–runs like this: Symphony orchestras are in dire trouble. The traditional symphony format, including the repertoire, is no longer relevant to contemporary society. For it to be meaningful, and therefore in order to survive, it has to connect with a more diverse local community and compete more actively for the entertainment dollar. In other words, orchestras have to jettison the “standard” repertoire and create new formats for less formal performance experiences in venues that will attract a more hip crowd. Otherwise we might as well pack our bags and go home.

I find this narrative to be flawed for a number of reasons. First, I don’t see that orchestras are on the verge of extinction. On the contrary. People who make this argument are viewing only the top echelon of major symphony orchestras, and even in this regard its a fiction. There is no doubt that when economic times are tough, orchestras struggle. When times get better, they rebound. In other words, they’re like everyone else. But going beyond fully professional orchestras, when you look at the depth of symphonic orchestras in American society, including hundreds of semi-professional, community, youth, college, festival, and school orchestras, a strong case can be made that symphony orchestras have never been as alive and well.

And you know what music they’re playing? They’re playing Mozart and Beethoven, Mahler and Strauss, Tchaikovsky and Rimsky-Korsakov, Debussy and Ravel. You know why? They’re great composers. Musicians love to play their music and audiences love to hear it. No one has gotten tired of the Mona Lisa. Should we program more music of contemporary, ethnically diverse composers? Absolutely! If it’s worthy music, by all means. But it’s ass backwards if the reason is out of fear that otherwise symphony orchestras will die.

But what about the  format? And those stuffy concert halls? Outreach and education activities are great, and the more the better. But how can they “save the symphony” if the raison d’etre, playing symphonies, is devalued? What would the purpose of such an effort be? If a group of symphony musicians playing Piazzolla tangos in a pub floats their boat, that’s great. That would be a lot of fun. Go for it!  And maybe it would attract one or two people to go to a real symphony concert. (Personally, when I’m at a pub, I’d rather watch a ball game while I’m drinking my Rolling Rock than listen to string quartets. But, hey, that’s just me.) But here’s the problem. It’s a challenge to play Tchaikovsky Fifth in a bar. I’m not sure know how you’d fit all those bass players in there. Maybe behind the pool tables. So I think we’re stuck with concert halls. And you know what? Some people think it’s very special to go to a concert hall. In fact, a lot of people feel that way. Maybe that’s why they’ve kept coming for three hundred years.

In this day and age when we’re surrounded by external stimuli 24-7, when our computerized world frames us into thinking and feeling and responding in nano seconds, perhaps the appeal of two hours in the comfort of an impressively comfortable concert hall, listening to a Rossini overture, a sublime Mozart piano concerto, and a Brahms symphony, is actually something that people would be more inclined to enjoy more now than ever before. To paraphrase Mark Twain, the reports of the death of the symphony orchestra have been greatly exaggerated.

Advertisements

8 thoughts on “On the Road, Day 11: A Case for Quality

  1. frances dearman

    I was pressured to get a cellphone by the president of the congregation I serve, this past year. I framed this as the “dire emergency” cellphone, and invited the staff, board, c’tee chairs and pastoral concertn c’tee to begin their calls to me on the dire emergency cell-phone by identifying which of Vancouver’s fine hospitals they were calling from, or at what freight their bail bondsman had set the price of their liberty. How can a person hope to track down a deep thought in a world of constant connection? Am enjoying your travel blog very much indeed, Gerry. Thank you. Safe journeys, Fran in Canada

    Rev. Fran Dearman

    Date: Wed, 20 Apr 2016 04:44:21 +0000 To: fdearman@hotmail.com

    Like

    Reply
    1. eliaspattn Post author

      Frances, Thank you for your comment. It’s good to hear from you again. People sometimes have a hard time understanding the desire not to be connected. For me it’s liberating when, from time to time, I’ll be camping in the desert or hiking up a mountain somewhere and no one in the world knows where I am. Amazingly enough, simply playing an instrument made out of wood and creating sounds acoustically has a similar effect! Just one question for you–in your comment you’ve included a lot of contact information, perhaps inadvertently. Would you like me to delete that?

      On Wed, Apr 20, 2016 at 1:25 AM, GERALD ELIAS – Author and Musician wrote:

      >

      Like

      Reply
    1. eliaspattn Post author

      I never even thought it was catastrophic if mainly older people attended concerts. Though I can’t document it, I have a feeling that’s the way it has generally been for the past few centuries. Many people reach a stage in life where their tastes evolve toward classical music, plus they have the means and the time to attend. That being said, I’m very glad to see lots of younger faces!

      Like

      Reply
  2. Gail Hercules

    Not the case in Oxford, MS, Only older people and students who have to attend for credit. The tickets are only $10. What a bargain!

    Like

    Reply
    1. eliaspattn Post author

      I know what you mean. It’s funny how sometimes in a college town, where “culture” is at one fingertips, it’s taken for granted. Maybe with youtube, iTunes, and the like, younger people on college campuses are just over-staturated. What do you suggest?

      Like

      Reply
  3. James

    Gerry;

    This from the League’s site about what some smaller orchestras are having to do to stay in business. It may be saving an orchestra, and orchestra jobs, but let’s not fool ourselves into thinking that what the Asheville Symphony, and far too many others, is forced to do can be called saving the art form of great classical music.

    In Wednesday’s (5/25) Citizen-Times (Asheville, N.C.), Hayley Benton writes that the Asheville Symphony’s just-released album, Sessions, was “an effort that took a year to complete with more than 125 people, including eight local bands of different genres… [Sessions] begins with a jazzy world-beat from Rising Appalachia, soon escalated by a wave of strings that takes the track to another level. Next up is a number from pop-rock band Doc Aquatic, to which the symphony adds a bit of instrumental sunshine…. The project began as a simple idea: What if the symphony could expand its normal reach—appealing to regulars and rockers alike? What if the city—in all of its artistic diversity—could be reflected in a single soundtrack? Just as the city of Asheville is a unique, ‘we want to be seen as an orchestra of and for our community. An orchestra distinct to Asheville,’ said Daniel Meyer, conductor and music director of the symphony.” Asheville Symphony Executive Director David Whitehill describes the recording as “a snapshot of where Asheville is today, musically, and how this community has grown and matured and really is an oasis of music.”

    James

    Like

    Reply
    1. eliaspattn Post author

      James, I know this is an issue that you’ve pondered for many a year, and I’m totally with you on this. There are all kinds of ensembles that can play pop, rock, jazz, blues, and Broadway better than a symphony orchestra. But there’s only one ensemble that can play a Brahms symphony. And that’s a symphony orchestra. Orchestras, regardless of size, should do what no one else can, and go from there.

      Like

      Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s